6.8 C
London
Saturday, January 31, 2026
HomeOpinion"Trump Grovelling Dominates 2025 as New Dictionary Terms Fall Short"

“Trump Grovelling Dominates 2025 as New Dictionary Terms Fall Short”

Date:

Related stories

“Man’s Near-Death Allergy Ordeal Reveals Profound Insights”

A man who experienced an allergic reaction shared his...

“Stay Cozy on Dog Walks with Discounted Heated Gilet”

As the UK experiences severe snow and subzero temperatures,...

“BHF Warns of Heart Risks in UK Cold Snap”

A cautionary message has been issued by a cardiac...

Newlywed woman survives motorway crash, killed by lorry

A tragic incident unfolded as a newlywed woman survived...

In a year filled with sycophantic gestures towards authority figures, the latest dictionary terms of the year like “rage bait,” “parasocial,” and “vibe coding” seem detached from reality. These phrases, seemingly concocted by a tech-savvy individual, fail to truly capture the spirit of the times.

If there were a phrase to encapsulate the essence of this challenging year, it would undoubtedly be “Trump grovelling.” This expression likely crossed the minds of many people throughout 2025, expressing disgust at the overt displays of flattery towards the former president.

Since his inauguration, tech magnates shamelessly sought favor from Trump in pursuit of greater riches, transforming cabinet meetings into spectacles of unwavering adulation akin to medieval courts. Individuals were compelled to shower him with praise comparable to that seen in North Korea to earn his favor.

Not only Americans engaged in nauseating displays of admiration; world leaders also vied for Trump’s approval. Benjamin Netanyahu commended Trump for military actions against Iran as “civilizational forces” expressed gratitude, while Fifa’s Gianni Infantino suggested Trump deserved a peace prize.

Prominent figures, including Nato General Secretary Mark Rutte and Keir Starmer, resorted to groveling to appease Trump, illustrating the extent of flattery endured by those seeking his approval. However, as the year nears its end, a glimmer of hope emerges in an unexpected quarter—the BBC.

Trump’s audacious demand for a substantial fine against the BBC for alleged damages caused by an edited speech should be met with a firm response. The BBC should counter-sue, refuting Trump’s claims of misrepresentation and highlighting the damaging impact of his falsehoods on the renowned news outlet’s reputation.

Critics suggest Trump is exploiting the BBC incident to divert attention from other pressing issues, such as the Epstein files and economic challenges. Therefore, the BBC should challenge him in court, holding him accountable for his actions and statements leading up to the Capitol Hill incident.

It is imperative for the BBC to stand up against Trump’s manipulation and falsehoods, even if it requires financial support through crowdfunding efforts. Taking a stand against such behavior is paramount, signaling a rejection of subservience to manipulative tactics.

MyHeritage DNA offers users access to an extensive database of historical records and the opportunity to connect with newfound relatives through shared genetic information.

Latest stories