Five former chairs of a group advising the federal government on endangered species have released a public letter expressing worries about potential revisions to the Species At Risk Act. They suggest that these changes could result in the deliberate extinction of endangered species in Canada. Over 600 species fall under this legislation, and the proposed alterations could render the act ineffective, as per a recent press release issued by the scientists.
The scientists, who previously chaired the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC), forwarded the letter to the federal government last month. COSEWIC is an independent body that evaluates species at risk of extinction and recommends their inclusion in endangered species legislation.
In making the letter public, the scientists aimed to prevent Canadians from contributing to the intentional extinction of Canadian wildlife species. The letter coincides with the government’s review of environmental regulations, including potential amendments to the Species At Risk Act, which could expedite the approval and construction of major projects.
Recently, two federal discussion papers proposed approving significant projects before review and exempting specific projects from the required “jeopardy test,” if deemed in the national interest. This move has raised concerns among experts like David Green, a biologist and former COSEWIC chair, who views these proposed changes as detrimental to endangered species protection.
Jeopardy tests are vital safeguards that prevent projects harming listed species and their critical habitats. These tests serve as crucial protection measures for species facing extinction. The proposed revisions would grant the government powers to establish “federal economic zones” for pre-approving industrial development and to fast-track pipelines before route establishment, bypassing federal assessments.
The letter highlights the potential impact of a new West Coast oil pipeline, currently under consideration as a project of national interest. This pipeline poses a significant threat to species like the southern resident killer whale and Chinook salmon, both listed under the act, in the Salish Sea region.
The proposed changes have raised eyebrows, with experts like Kathryn Harrison, a UBC professor specializing in climate and energy politics, describing them as setting an unprecedented precedent. Despite the lack of a government response to the scientists’ letter, the federal government has emphasized its commitment to species conservation and meeting obligations under the Species At Risk Act.
The government justifies the proposed changes by citing the need to expedite projects for economic growth and reduce dependency on U.S. trade amidst ongoing trade tensions. An official response from the Privy Council Office stated that no decision has been made regarding changes to the Species At Risk Act, with a report on public feedback expected before summer’s end.
Following criticism from various stakeholders, including First Nations and environmental groups, the government extended the public consultation period, which concluded last month. Legislative action is anticipated after Parliament resumes in September, with experts cautioning against irreversible impacts on Canadian species if the proposed changes are implemented.